Michelle May, relief worker, travel writer, and school psychologist, has raised an interesting question on PBS’ MediaShift blog. When is it appropriate to publicly post photos of victims of disaster, such as the Haiti earthquake?
Like many other volunteers who went to the devastated country to lend a hand, May took photos of what she saw, including hospital images of happy children post-surgery before going into the MRA with a spine surgeon in New Jersey, patients waiting in line, and images outside of the hospital as well. Many of her colleagues took similar photos, but on a much more questionable level, such as “photos of an anonymous leg being cut into, an un-named mother giving birth, people who are clearly sedated, and bleary-eyed volunteers drinking beer at the UN café.” Now some of those volunteers are wondering if they should remove their photos from Facebook and other social networking sites.
The coverage of the disaster by citizen journalists appeared first. That coverage has been given credit for keeping Haiti in the news and not allowing the short-attention-spanned public to forget. Still, there are those who don’t follow typical media guidelines, including ethical ones, which is one of the problems that often arise in regards to citizen journalism. May also discusses the flip side of this, however:
[…B]logs, Facebook posts, and tweets from citizens can sometimes do a better job of putting a human face on the suffering in Haiti, and bring it home to people who may not otherwise pay attention. We’ve become desensitized to the way traditional media portray events like the recent one in Haiti; it’s possible that the authenticity contained in the accounts of non-journalists on the ground have a greater impact on folks back in the States.
May points out that traditional media has long been sharing images of questionable privacy. She asks, “Is it more invasive just because some of us don’t have a press pass?”
A good example is the photo accompanying this blog post of a sleeping mother surrounded by her children. The woman is wearing a skirt, the open side of which is facing the camera, and the little girl in the foreground is shirtless. How can a sleeping family give permission for their photo to be taken? It’s questionable, yet it was taken by an organization affiliated with the United Nations.
May’s personal decision was to keep most of her photos online because she did not feel they were an invasion of anyone’s privacy. “Then again,” she writes, “maybe I am simply desensitized and part of the system myself.”