<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SixEstate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sixestate.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sixestate.com</link>
	<description>Brand News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 03:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wanted: Tomorrow&#8217;s Blogger by Marcus Sheridan-The Sales Lion</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/wanted-tomorrows-blogger/#comment-5971</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Sheridan-The Sales Lion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 03:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=12617#comment-5971</guid>
		<description>Good stuff Katie, and thanks so much for the mention! Keep pushing that awesome vision of yours :-)

Marcus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff Katie, and thanks so much for the mention! Keep pushing that awesome vision of yours :-)</p>
<p>Marcus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Visual Side of Content Marketing by Steve O'Keefe</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/the-visual-side-of-content-marketing/#comment-5967</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve O'Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=12513#comment-5967</guid>
		<description>Tatyana,

Another terrific blog post!

As an old-school marketer, one of the hardest things to get used to about online marketing is that *color is free*! In print marketing, color is used sparingly due to the cost. That causes a color-stingy mindset that unfortunately interferes with creating compelling online content.

As you can see from the new SixEstate home page, we have gotten over our fear of color!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tatyana,</p>
<p>Another terrific blog post!</p>
<p>As an old-school marketer, one of the hardest things to get used to about online marketing is that *color is free*! In print marketing, color is used sparingly due to the cost. That causes a color-stingy mindset that unfortunately interferes with creating compelling online content.</p>
<p>As you can see from the new SixEstate home page, we have gotten over our fear of color!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Content Is Currency by Steve O'Keefe</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/content-is-currency/#comment-5959</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve O'Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 18:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=12526#comment-5959</guid>
		<description>Katie,

Welcome to the SixEstate Blog! I&#039;m looking forward to reading your contributions.

The video works, not just because it is jarring, but because it turns the old approach of push marketing upside down.

The way to succeed is writing something people want to read.

Thanks,
STEVE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie,</p>
<p>Welcome to the SixEstate Blog! I&#8217;m looking forward to reading your contributions.</p>
<p>The video works, not just because it is jarring, but because it turns the old approach of push marketing upside down.</p>
<p>The way to succeed is writing something people want to read.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
STEVE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Interview With Natasha Dedis, Founder and CEO of Unthink by Jere Hodges</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/interview-with-natasha-dedis-founder-ceo-of-unthink/#comment-4082</link>
		<dc:creator>Jere Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=9964#comment-4082</guid>
		<description>Clearly, Facebook has deceived the users – because Facebook told us that we were its customers. In fact, Facebook’s users are NOT its customers – we are its PRODUCTS – and its customers are the companies that pay Facebook for access to US.

I look forward to examining Unthink.com with an objective eye, to see if they can deliver what Ms. Dedis has promised – a social network where the users ARE the customers, where what WE say and think matters – where WE control our experience instead of being manipulated like so much data in a Facebook database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, Facebook has deceived the users – because Facebook told us that we were its customers. In fact, Facebook’s users are NOT its customers – we are its PRODUCTS – and its customers are the companies that pay Facebook for access to US.</p>
<p>I look forward to examining Unthink.com with an objective eye, to see if they can deliver what Ms. Dedis has promised – a social network where the users ARE the customers, where what WE say and think matters – where WE control our experience instead of being manipulated like so much data in a Facebook database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Capitalizing on Brand Loyalty for Media Companies by STEVE O'KEEFE</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/brand-loyalty-for-media-companies/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>STEVE O'KEEFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=11541#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>There may be more to this story than &quot;Britannica is dead, long live Wikipedia,&quot; which seems to be the consensus online.

In an article for The Wall Street Journal, tech columnist L. Gordon Crovitz says, &quot;[A Britannica] representative says 500,000 subscribers pay some $70 a year for unlimited access to its website. This means that despite the free alternative of Wikipedia, more people pay to access Britannica online annually than paid for the print version in any year.&quot;

That&#039;s $35 million a year -- in subscriptions to a website. That sounds incredibly successful to me. And it sounds like the Britannica brand is working online. Maybe Wikipedia should be the one drooling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be more to this story than &#8220;Britannica is dead, long live Wikipedia,&#8221; which seems to be the consensus online.</p>
<p>In an article for The Wall Street Journal, tech columnist L. Gordon Crovitz says, &#8220;[A Britannica] representative says 500,000 subscribers pay some $70 a year for unlimited access to its website. This means that despite the free alternative of Wikipedia, more people pay to access Britannica online annually than paid for the print version in any year.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s $35 million a year &#8212; in subscriptions to a website. That sounds incredibly successful to me. And it sounds like the Britannica brand is working online. Maybe Wikipedia should be the one drooling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Demand Media: Down, Not Dead by STEVE OKEEFE</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/demand-media-down-not-dead/#comment-4067</link>
		<dc:creator>STEVE OKEEFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=11473#comment-4067</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I&#039;m not sure how eNom is doing overall, but they just got a nice little chunk of business from Posterous via Twitter. Twitter purchased Posterous a few days ago and transferred domain management for thousands of domains to eNom.

Thanks for chiming in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how eNom is doing overall, but they just got a nice little chunk of business from Posterous via Twitter. Twitter purchased Posterous a few days ago and transferred domain management for thousands of domains to eNom.</p>
<p>Thanks for chiming in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Demand Media: Down, Not Dead by Scott Krager</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/demand-media-down-not-dead/#comment-4065</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Krager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 06:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=11473#comment-4065</guid>
		<description>Very nice analysis of the rise, fall and maybe stabilization of DMD. 

One thing people do forget about Demand Media, they own enom, which is a very stable and reliable income stream as one of the larger domain registrars. Does anyone know how enom is doing? Did they benefit from any of the Godaddy fallout?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice analysis of the rise, fall and maybe stabilization of DMD. </p>
<p>One thing people do forget about Demand Media, they own enom, which is a very stable and reliable income stream as one of the larger domain registrars. Does anyone know how enom is doing? Did they benefit from any of the Godaddy fallout?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Demand Media: Down, Not Dead by STEVE OKEEFE</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/demand-media-down-not-dead/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator>STEVE OKEEFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=11473#comment-4063</guid>
		<description>Welcome back, Tatyana! That&#039;s some post. The link to WebProNews for the official Demand Media notice to writers was also a very insightful.

I feel badly for Demand Media -- and their out-of-work writers. I think the company has the right idea about creating their own content to match up to popular search terms. The problems come from focusing on traffic instead of content -- it leads to games rather than goods.

As you conclude, they have to focus on building a brand, not just traffic. Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back, Tatyana! That&#8217;s some post. The link to WebProNews for the official Demand Media notice to writers was also a very insightful.</p>
<p>I feel badly for Demand Media &#8212; and their out-of-work writers. I think the company has the right idea about creating their own content to match up to popular search terms. The problems come from focusing on traffic instead of content &#8212; it leads to games rather than goods.</p>
<p>As you conclude, they have to focus on building a brand, not just traffic. Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Demand Media: Down, Not Dead by David</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/demand-media-down-not-dead/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=11473#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>Great post Tatyana.I think it&#039;s interesting to follow Demand&#039;s downward trend in the market. You can see a few small spikes here and there when they make a new acquisition. But ultimately, even as they try to sculpt a new model and buy up new properties to fit that model, I doubt they will ever recover from Panda. I don&#039;t see these new initiatives ever overcoming the lost ad revenue that was driven by pre-Panda search traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Tatyana.I think it&#8217;s interesting to follow Demand&#8217;s downward trend in the market. You can see a few small spikes here and there when they make a new acquisition. But ultimately, even as they try to sculpt a new model and buy up new properties to fit that model, I doubt they will ever recover from Panda. I don&#8217;t see these new initiatives ever overcoming the lost ad revenue that was driven by pre-Panda search traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How-To: Grappling With Facebook&#8217;s Timeline (Part One) by George Williams</title>
		<link>http://sixestate.com/how-to-use-facebook-timeline-part-one/#comment-4055</link>
		<dc:creator>George Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sixestate.com/?p=11443#comment-4055</guid>
		<description>Like most changes at Facebook you have a week because that is what they say you have. You ave the ability to edit your profile any time, but the stated reason for the week is so that you can limit any posts from the past that you might want to hide. 

Once timeline goes live you&#039;ll be able to edit within it&#039;s framework (landing tabs have now become apps, etc.) I&#039;ll be getting more in depth about that in part two! 

Thanks for reading, and feel free to hit me up with any other questions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most changes at Facebook you have a week because that is what they say you have. You ave the ability to edit your profile any time, but the stated reason for the week is so that you can limit any posts from the past that you might want to hide. </p>
<p>Once timeline goes live you&#8217;ll be able to edit within it&#8217;s framework (landing tabs have now become apps, etc.) I&#8217;ll be getting more in depth about that in part two! </p>
<p>Thanks for reading, and feel free to hit me up with any other questions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

